<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1521 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198162</link>
    <description>A private complainant&#039;s appeal against acquittal in a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act lies only to the High Court under the Criminal Procedure Code. A Sessions Court has no statutory jurisdiction to entertain such an appeal, and any order passed on it is without jurisdiction. The consequence is that an order of remand or other appellate direction made by the Addl. Sessions Judge on the complainant&#039;s appeal cannot stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 14:22:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1521 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198162</link>
      <description>A private complainant&#039;s appeal against acquittal in a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act lies only to the High Court under the Criminal Procedure Code. A Sessions Court has no statutory jurisdiction to entertain such an appeal, and any order passed on it is without jurisdiction. The consequence is that an order of remand or other appellate direction made by the Addl. Sessions Judge on the complainant&#039;s appeal cannot stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>