<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1521 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198162</link>
    <description>The appellate court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal filed by the complainant against the order of acquittal. The Addl. Sessions Judge No. 1 Udaipur&#039;s order was deemed unsustainable, leading to the revision petition being allowed and the impugned order set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 14:22:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1521 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198162</link>
      <description>The appellate court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal filed by the complainant against the order of acquittal. The Addl. Sessions Judge No. 1 Udaipur&#039;s order was deemed unsustainable, leading to the revision petition being allowed and the impugned order set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>