https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198154 The court held that the agreement for fixation of rent through Government valuers could not be specifically enforced as it conflicted with the statutory provisions of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. The court emphasized that the Act provides the exclusive mechanism for determining fair rent, and any agreement contrary to these provisions cannot be upheld. The appeal was allowed, the judgment for specific performance was set aside, and the appellant was permitted to withdraw the deposited amount without costs awarded. R.N. Sinha, J., concurred with the judgment. en-us Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:49:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198154 The court held that the agreement for fixation of rent through Government valuers could not be specifically enforced as it conflicted with the statutory provisions of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. The court emphasized that the Act provides the exclusive mechanism for determining fair rent, and any agreement contrary to these provisions cannot be upheld. The appeal was allowed, the judgment for specific performance was set aside, and the appellant was permitted to withdraw the deposited amount without costs awarded. R.N. Sinha, J., concurred with the judgment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198154