<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 672 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198153</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta set aside the order admitting the winding-up petition due to lack of proper notice, fair rent determination, and premature debt claim under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act. The Court upheld the appellant&#039;s right to dispute rent enhancement, emphasizing the Controller&#039;s role in determining fair rent and maintaining jurisdiction over rent-related disputes, ultimately safeguarding tenant interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 672 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198153</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta set aside the order admitting the winding-up petition due to lack of proper notice, fair rent determination, and premature debt claim under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act. The Court upheld the appellant&#039;s right to dispute rent enhancement, emphasizing the Controller&#039;s role in determining fair rent and maintaining jurisdiction over rent-related disputes, ultimately safeguarding tenant interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>