<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 372 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198152</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appellant&#039;s claim for sub-tenancy and entitlement to vesting under Section 535(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The application for disclaimer of the property by the landlord was allowed. The court directed a trial on evidence to determine the ownership of movable assets in the guest house. The appeal was dismissed with costs, and the appellant&#039;s request for a stay of the judgment was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:26:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 372 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198152</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appellant&#039;s claim for sub-tenancy and entitlement to vesting under Section 535(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The application for disclaimer of the property by the landlord was allowed. The court directed a trial on evidence to determine the ownership of movable assets in the guest house. The appeal was dismissed with costs, and the appellant&#039;s request for a stay of the judgment was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>