<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 703 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198148</link>
    <description>Where a contract requires disputes to be referred to an arbitration committee within 30 days of receipt of the demand notice and fee, the period runs from actual receipt of the notice, not from any later internal office entry. If the respondent does not take an effective step within that stipulated time, it forfeits the contractual right to make the appointment under the agreed procedure. In that default situation, recourse under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 becomes available, and the court may appoint an arbitrator. The decision therefore treats non-compliance with the contractual timeframe as a waiver of the appointment right and upholds judicial intervention to constitute the tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 10:38:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 703 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198148</link>
      <description>Where a contract requires disputes to be referred to an arbitration committee within 30 days of receipt of the demand notice and fee, the period runs from actual receipt of the notice, not from any later internal office entry. If the respondent does not take an effective step within that stipulated time, it forfeits the contractual right to make the appointment under the agreed procedure. In that default situation, recourse under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 becomes available, and the court may appoint an arbitrator. The decision therefore treats non-compliance with the contractual timeframe as a waiver of the appointment right and upholds judicial intervention to constitute the tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>