https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198146 An arbitral claim for compensation for loss of productivity was barred by Clause 59 of the A.P. Detailed Standard Specifications, which confined the remedy to reasonable extension of time, and by Section 55 of the Contract Act where delayed performance was accepted without reservation. Damages for loss of profit could be considered where breach prevented execution, but the award had to address the actual work obstructed and the evidence on site availability; the original amount was reduced for failure to do so. A further sum on the loss-of-profit award was impermissible as double compensation or damages on damages. Post-decree interest was also payable, and the omission to grant it was corrected. en-us Wed, 06 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jan 2018 10:13:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198146 An arbitral claim for compensation for loss of productivity was barred by Clause 59 of the A.P. Detailed Standard Specifications, which confined the remedy to reasonable extension of time, and by Section 55 of the Contract Act where delayed performance was accepted without reservation. Damages for loss of profit could be considered where breach prevented execution, but the award had to address the actual work obstructed and the evidence on site availability; the original amount was reduced for failure to do so. A further sum on the loss-of-profit award was impermissible as double compensation or damages on damages. Post-decree interest was also payable, and the omission to grant it was corrected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198146