<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1069 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354333</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction for extending scrutiny without higher authorities&#039; approval. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer regarding long-term capital gain and dismissed the legal grounds raised by the assessee. The CIT(A) found no jurisdictional violation and upheld the additions, leading to the dismissal of Ground No. 1 &amp;amp; 2 of the appeal. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to pass a speaking order on other challenges, allowing grounds 3 to 7 for statistical purposes and remanding the issue on merits back to the CIT(A) for detailed consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 08:28:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1069 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354333</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction for extending scrutiny without higher authorities&#039; approval. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer regarding long-term capital gain and dismissed the legal grounds raised by the assessee. The CIT(A) found no jurisdictional violation and upheld the additions, leading to the dismissal of Ground No. 1 &amp;amp; 2 of the appeal. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to pass a speaking order on other challenges, allowing grounds 3 to 7 for statistical purposes and remanding the issue on merits back to the CIT(A) for detailed consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>