<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1057 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354321</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that providing tax advisory services did not qualify as &quot;management consultancy&quot; under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s focus on tax compliance advice for specific laws, rather than general management consultancy, led to the decision. The Tribunal emphasized that activities must contribute to improving organizational systems to be considered management consultancy. Citing precedent, the Tribunal set aside the tax liability and penalty imposed, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 08:13:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1057 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354321</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that providing tax advisory services did not qualify as &quot;management consultancy&quot; under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s focus on tax compliance advice for specific laws, rather than general management consultancy, led to the decision. The Tribunal emphasized that activities must contribute to improving organizational systems to be considered management consultancy. Citing precedent, the Tribunal set aside the tax liability and penalty imposed, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>