https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354314 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to the adjudicating authority's failure to comply with its directions, resulting in the lack of proper justification for duty demand, penalties, and interest in the denovo proceedings. The Tribunal found that the denovo adjudication did not conduct an independent analysis as directed, relying on the same evidence from the previous order. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. en-us Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354314 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to the adjudicating authority's failure to comply with its directions, resulting in the lack of proper justification for duty demand, penalties, and interest in the denovo proceedings. The Tribunal found that the denovo adjudication did not conduct an independent analysis as directed, relying on the same evidence from the previous order. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354314