<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 44 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11569</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 54,75,000 on account of premium on the redeemable debentures. The court found that the terms of the issued debentures were not altered during the assessment year, and the judgments of both the Supreme Court and its own previous ruling applied to the case. The Department&#039;s arguments were deemed meritless, and the court concluded in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 44 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11569</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 54,75,000 on account of premium on the redeemable debentures. The court found that the terms of the issued debentures were not altered during the assessment year, and the judgments of both the Supreme Court and its own previous ruling applied to the case. The Department&#039;s arguments were deemed meritless, and the court concluded in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>