<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1524 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198140</link>
    <description>Material relied upon in a show cause notice cannot be withheld from the person proceeded against on the ground that it was gathered during search or derived from foreign sources. The basic requirement of natural justice is that a person facing coercive proceedings must be furnished copies of the documents and statements used against them, and merely allowing inspection is not an adequate substitute. Article 26(2) of the OECD Model Tax Convention was noted as permitting disclosure to persons concerned with assessment or prosecution. The petitioners were therefore entitled to copies of all relied-upon documents, seized material, and statements before filing their replies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 22:48:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1524 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198140</link>
      <description>Material relied upon in a show cause notice cannot be withheld from the person proceeded against on the ground that it was gathered during search or derived from foreign sources. The basic requirement of natural justice is that a person facing coercive proceedings must be furnished copies of the documents and statements used against them, and merely allowing inspection is not an adequate substitute. Article 26(2) of the OECD Model Tax Convention was noted as permitting disclosure to persons concerned with assessment or prosecution. The petitioners were therefore entitled to copies of all relied-upon documents, seized material, and statements before filing their replies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>