<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 889 - KERLA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198130</link>
    <description>The Full Bench held that writ petitions under Article 226 are maintainable in contractual matters involving the State, particularly when the State&#039;s actions are arbitrary, unfair, or against public interest. The judgment underscores the High Court&#039;s broad powers to uphold justice and the public law element in State contracts. The cases were remanded to the respective Benches for final orders, with directives for the State on the payment of contractors&#039; bills.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:49:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 889 - KERLA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198130</link>
      <description>The Full Bench held that writ petitions under Article 226 are maintainable in contractual matters involving the State, particularly when the State&#039;s actions are arbitrary, unfair, or against public interest. The judgment underscores the High Court&#039;s broad powers to uphold justice and the public law element in State contracts. The cases were remanded to the respective Benches for final orders, with directives for the State on the payment of contractors&#039; bills.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>