https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198124 A writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable only if the petition discloses that the cause of action, or part of it, arose within the High Court's territorial jurisdiction. On the stated facts, no such averment was made and the Court found that no part of the cause of action arose within that jurisdiction. It also noted that remand would be inappropriate where jurisdiction itself was absent. The dismissal of the writ petition for want of territorial jurisdiction was therefore upheld and the special leave petition was dismissed. en-us Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jan 2018 17:33:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198124 A writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable only if the petition discloses that the cause of action, or part of it, arose within the High Court's territorial jurisdiction. On the stated facts, no such averment was made and the Court found that no part of the cause of action arose within that jurisdiction. It also noted that remand would be inappropriate where jurisdiction itself was absent. The dismissal of the writ petition for want of territorial jurisdiction was therefore upheld and the special leave petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198124