<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (11) TMI 235 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198120</link>
    <description>The appellate court set aside the first court&#039;s order, except for restraining the defendants from calling the AGMs under the impugned notices. It emphasized the need for proper management and adherence to statutory provisions, allowing for lawful AGMs to be called either by the directors or through directions from the Central Government to prevent a deadlock in the company&#039;s management and ensure compliance with the Companies Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 17:16:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (11) TMI 235 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198120</link>
      <description>The appellate court set aside the first court&#039;s order, except for restraining the defendants from calling the AGMs under the impugned notices. It emphasized the need for proper management and adherence to statutory provisions, allowing for lawful AGMs to be called either by the directors or through directions from the Central Government to prevent a deadlock in the company&#039;s management and ensure compliance with the Companies Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>