<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 21 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11566</link>
    <description>Receipt and later sale of developed plots obtained in lieu of compensation for compulsorily acquired inherited agricultural land was treated as realisation of capital value rather than an adventure in the nature of trade. The character of the transaction depended on the totality of the facts, including that the land was inherited and not purchased, and that the assessee merely accepted developed plots under the acquisition scheme. Because the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion rested on factual appreciation, no referable question of law arose merely from disagreement with that inference, and the reference was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 21 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11566</link>
      <description>Receipt and later sale of developed plots obtained in lieu of compensation for compulsorily acquired inherited agricultural land was treated as realisation of capital value rather than an adventure in the nature of trade. The character of the transaction depended on the totality of the facts, including that the land was inherited and not purchased, and that the assessee merely accepted developed plots under the acquisition scheme. Because the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion rested on factual appreciation, no referable question of law arose merely from disagreement with that inference, and the reference was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>