https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198113 A contract linked to a Section 21 Urban Land Ceiling scheme was held not specifically enforceable because it was determinable before possession passed and fell within the statutory bar on determinable contracts. The Court further treated the arrangement as requiring continuing acts of preparation, sanction, construction and allotment, which would need ongoing supervision and could be refused in equity under the Specific Relief Act. It also held that a Section 21 scheme must be tested against the master plan in force when the scheme is considered, and repeal of the ULC Act did not preserve any enforceable right where no valid sanction had accrued. en-us Wed, 21 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:41:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198113 A contract linked to a Section 21 Urban Land Ceiling scheme was held not specifically enforceable because it was determinable before possession passed and fell within the statutory bar on determinable contracts. The Court further treated the arrangement as requiring continuing acts of preparation, sanction, construction and allotment, which would need ongoing supervision and could be refused in equity under the Specific Relief Act. It also held that a Section 21 scheme must be tested against the master plan in force when the scheme is considered, and repeal of the ULC Act did not preserve any enforceable right where no valid sanction had accrued. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198113