<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 686 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198106</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to cancel the penalty of Rs. 17,46,500 under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It found that the Assessing Officer did not establish the required satisfaction of income concealment before initiating penalty proceedings. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, and the penalty was deemed unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 12:00:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 686 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198106</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to cancel the penalty of Rs. 17,46,500 under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It found that the Assessing Officer did not establish the required satisfaction of income concealment before initiating penalty proceedings. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, and the penalty was deemed unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>