<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 35 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11558</link>
    <description>A firm was treated as reconstituted, not dissolved, where three partners continued, the two minors earlier admitted to partnership benefits were dropped, and five new partners were inducted. On those facts, section 187(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied because some original partners remained while others ceased and new partners were admitted. The assessment had therefore to be made as one assessment on the firm as constituted at the time of assessment under section 187(1), rather than by splitting the year into separate assessments on the basis of dissolution. The questions were answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 35 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11558</link>
      <description>A firm was treated as reconstituted, not dissolved, where three partners continued, the two minors earlier admitted to partnership benefits were dropped, and five new partners were inducted. On those facts, section 187(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied because some original partners remained while others ceased and new partners were admitted. The assessment had therefore to be made as one assessment on the firm as constituted at the time of assessment under section 187(1), rather than by splitting the year into separate assessments on the basis of dissolution. The questions were answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>