<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1048 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354312</link>
    <description>At the admission stage under the Income-tax Act, an assessee must satisfy the Settlement Commission that the disclosure is full and true and that the manner of earning the income has been properly disclosed. The Commission found that the seized diary entries, alleged &quot;not done&quot; transactions, correlation with the paper books, and additional income shown in the second application were not cogently explained. The High Court declined to reappreciate that factual assessment or substitute its own view in writ jurisdiction, finding no palpable error, arbitrariness, or breach of the Act. The rejection of the settlement application was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1048 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354312</link>
      <description>At the admission stage under the Income-tax Act, an assessee must satisfy the Settlement Commission that the disclosure is full and true and that the manner of earning the income has been properly disclosed. The Commission found that the seized diary entries, alleged &quot;not done&quot; transactions, correlation with the paper books, and additional income shown in the second application were not cogently explained. The High Court declined to reappreciate that factual assessment or substitute its own view in writ jurisdiction, finding no palpable error, arbitrariness, or breach of the Act. The rejection of the settlement application was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>