<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1030 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354294</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act could not be upheld due to the defective show cause notice under Section 274. The notice failed to specify the charge against the Assessee, leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 08:58:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1030 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354294</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act could not be upheld due to the defective show cause notice under Section 274. The notice failed to specify the charge against the Assessee, leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>