<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1024 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354288</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to permit the cross-examination of witnesses as per Section 138B of the Customs Act, 1962. However, the Tribunal upheld the rejection of the request for supply of documents. The appeal, early hearing application, and stay application were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1024 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354288</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to permit the cross-examination of witnesses as per Section 138B of the Customs Act, 1962. However, the Tribunal upheld the rejection of the request for supply of documents. The appeal, early hearing application, and stay application were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>