<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1012 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354276</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a dispute over denial of Cenvat credit on capital goods used in manufacturing exempted goods under Central Excise Notification No. 30/04. It held that goods cleared for export should not be considered exempted, allowing Cenvat credit on capital goods used for exports alongside exempted domestic clearances. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant the benefit of Rule 6(6)(v) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1012 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354276</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a dispute over denial of Cenvat credit on capital goods used in manufacturing exempted goods under Central Excise Notification No. 30/04. It held that goods cleared for export should not be considered exempted, allowing Cenvat credit on capital goods used for exports alongside exempted domestic clearances. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant the benefit of Rule 6(6)(v) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>