https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198087 A company challenged a BIFR-sanctioned scheme and noted that its statutory appeal was pending when AAIFR was abolished on repeal of the Sick Industrial Companies regime. The grievance was that no continuing redressal forum had been provided for appeals against sanctioned schemes in such pending matters. The respondent produced an office memorandum dated 9 August 2017, but it did not address the effect of repeal on appeals like the petitioner's. On the respondent's request for instructions, the matter was adjourned and listed for further hearing. en-us Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:50:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198087 A company challenged a BIFR-sanctioned scheme and noted that its statutory appeal was pending when AAIFR was abolished on repeal of the Sick Industrial Companies regime. The grievance was that no continuing redressal forum had been provided for appeals against sanctioned schemes in such pending matters. The respondent produced an office memorandum dated 9 August 2017, but it did not address the effect of repeal on appeals like the petitioner's. On the respondent's request for instructions, the matter was adjourned and listed for further hearing. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198087