https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198086 A defect in investigation or sanction does not by itself vitiate a corruption prosecution unless prejudice or failure of justice is shown, and the alleged want of written authorisation was treated as a technical objection without demonstrated unfairness. Additional evidence may be received on appeal only in exceptional cases; the unproved telephone and electricity bills could not be relied on, but Ext. D-4 was admissible for consideration on its merits despite non-compliance with the prescribed form. Once Ext. D-4 was taken into account and the unproved bills excluded, the unexplained assets were materially reduced, and the remaining balance was too small on the facts to sustain a conviction for possession of disproportionate assets. en-us Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Aug 2023 16:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198086 A defect in investigation or sanction does not by itself vitiate a corruption prosecution unless prejudice or failure of justice is shown, and the alleged want of written authorisation was treated as a technical objection without demonstrated unfairness. Additional evidence may be received on appeal only in exceptional cases; the unproved telephone and electricity bills could not be relied on, but Ext. D-4 was admissible for consideration on its merits despite non-compliance with the prescribed form. Once Ext. D-4 was taken into account and the unproved bills excluded, the unexplained assets were materially reduced, and the remaining balance was too small on the facts to sustain a conviction for possession of disproportionate assets. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198086