<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 612 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198085</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the lower court orders and directed the application under Section 11(6) to be restored before the Chief Justice of the High Court for consideration and appointment of an arbitrator in accordance with the law, emphasizing that the right to appoint an arbitrator is not automatically forfeited after 30 days but must be exercised before the other party moves the court under Section 11. No costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:36:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 612 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198085</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the lower court orders and directed the application under Section 11(6) to be restored before the Chief Justice of the High Court for consideration and appointment of an arbitrator in accordance with the law, emphasizing that the right to appoint an arbitrator is not automatically forfeited after 30 days but must be exercised before the other party moves the court under Section 11. No costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>