<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 777 - COMPANY LAW BOARD CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198084</link>
    <description>The Company was directed to effect the transmission of 500 shares to the second petitioner, set aside the allotment of 750 shares to the second respondent, refund the share price, and rectify its register of members accordingly. The petition for mismanagement was dismissed due to lack of evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 777 - COMPANY LAW BOARD CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198084</link>
      <description>The Company was directed to effect the transmission of 500 shares to the second petitioner, set aside the allotment of 750 shares to the second respondent, refund the share price, and rectify its register of members accordingly. The petition for mismanagement was dismissed due to lack of evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>