https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198083 The court held that the writ petition against BCCI is maintainable under Article 226 as BCCI performs public functions and duties. The court clarified that not every action of BCCI would be subject to judicial review, only those involving public law elements. Judicial review under Article 226 focuses on the lawfulness of the decision-making process, not the decision itself. The judgment emphasizes the broader applicability of Article 226 to any entity performing public duties, regardless of its private or public status. en-us Mon, 04 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:28:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198083 The court held that the writ petition against BCCI is maintainable under Article 226 as BCCI performs public functions and duties. The court clarified that not every action of BCCI would be subject to judicial review, only those involving public law elements. Judicial review under Article 226 focuses on the lawfulness of the decision-making process, not the decision itself. The judgment emphasizes the broader applicability of Article 226 to any entity performing public duties, regardless of its private or public status. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198083