<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 404 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198082</link>
    <description>The court held that the defendant legally and validly terminated the agreement with the plaintiff. The court found that the agreement was determinable and could not be specifically enforced, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff&#039;s suit with costs. The plaintiff was not entitled to specific performance or an injunction as sought.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:15:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 404 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198082</link>
      <description>The court held that the defendant legally and validly terminated the agreement with the plaintiff. The court found that the agreement was determinable and could not be specifically enforced, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff&#039;s suit with costs. The plaintiff was not entitled to specific performance or an injunction as sought.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>