https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198082 A private commercial dealership agreement containing a 90-day termination clause was treated as validly terminable, and the contractual power to end the arrangement was not displaced by earlier interim orders. The challenge to clause 21 on grounds of public policy, unequal bargaining power, duress and unconscionability was rejected because the parties were business entities and the agreement had been accepted and performed for years. As the contract was found determinable rather than permanent or indeterminable, specific performance was unavailable and no injunction could be granted in the absence of a supporting negative covenant. Procedural objections did not change the substantive result. en-us Fri, 13 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:15:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198082 A private commercial dealership agreement containing a 90-day termination clause was treated as validly terminable, and the contractual power to end the arrangement was not displaced by earlier interim orders. The challenge to clause 21 on grounds of public policy, unequal bargaining power, duress and unconscionability was rejected because the parties were business entities and the agreement had been accepted and performed for years. As the contract was found determinable rather than permanent or indeterminable, specific performance was unavailable and no injunction could be granted in the absence of a supporting negative covenant. Procedural objections did not change the substantive result. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198082