https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198077 The appeal was dismissed with costs. The court affirmed that the insurance policy had been validly terminated by the respondent under Clause 10, which allowed termination at will. The court found no ambiguity in the clause and rejected arguments regarding the contra proferentem rule and repugnancy between clauses. The termination was deemed valid and not conditional in an illegal manner. Additionally, the court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the interest on the judgment claimed by the appellant. en-us Fri, 11 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198077 The appeal was dismissed with costs. The court affirmed that the insurance policy had been validly terminated by the respondent under Clause 10, which allowed termination at will. The court found no ambiguity in the clause and rejected arguments regarding the contra proferentem rule and repugnancy between clauses. The termination was deemed valid and not conditional in an illegal manner. Additionally, the court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the interest on the judgment claimed by the appellant. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 11 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198077