<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1618 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198072</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking to set aside a notice of termination and validate Operating Licence Agreements/Franchise Agreements for numerous restaurants. The decision was based on pending appeals before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, which had already granted leave for filing an application for interim relief. The Tribunal found it unnecessary to entertain the application and directed that any such request should be made before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. The dismissal was without costs and clarified that it did not address the merits of the issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:41:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1618 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198072</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking to set aside a notice of termination and validate Operating Licence Agreements/Franchise Agreements for numerous restaurants. The decision was based on pending appeals before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, which had already granted leave for filing an application for interim relief. The Tribunal found it unnecessary to entertain the application and directed that any such request should be made before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. The dismissal was without costs and clarified that it did not address the merits of the issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>