<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 1076 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198058</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) in the hands of the firm for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. The funds received by the partnership firm from a company where the partners were also shareholders were deemed dividend. However, as the partners were the beneficial shareholders and the funds were for their benefit, the Tribunal ruled that the deemed dividend should be assessed in the hands of the partners, not the firm. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:53:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 1076 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198058</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) in the hands of the firm for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. The funds received by the partnership firm from a company where the partners were also shareholders were deemed dividend. However, as the partners were the beneficial shareholders and the funds were for their benefit, the Tribunal ruled that the deemed dividend should be assessed in the hands of the partners, not the firm. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>