<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1261 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198054</link>
    <description>Criminal contempt proceedings are quasi-criminal and require strict compliance with mandatory procedure and natural justice. The alleged contemnor must be informed of the precise charge, supplied with the material relied upon, and given a fair opportunity to defend. Where the applicable rules require the charge to be reduced into writing and served with supporting documents, those safeguards are mandatory. An incomplete or misleading notice, coupled with failure to frame proper charges and furnish the relied-upon material, causes serious procedural prejudice and vitiates the conviction; the contempt conviction was therefore unsustainable and the appeals succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1261 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198054</link>
      <description>Criminal contempt proceedings are quasi-criminal and require strict compliance with mandatory procedure and natural justice. The alleged contemnor must be informed of the precise charge, supplied with the material relied upon, and given a fair opportunity to defend. Where the applicable rules require the charge to be reduced into writing and served with supporting documents, those safeguards are mandatory. An incomplete or misleading notice, coupled with failure to frame proper charges and furnish the relied-upon material, causes serious procedural prejudice and vitiates the conviction; the contempt conviction was therefore unsustainable and the appeals succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>