<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 33 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11539</link>
    <description>The court allowed the application for condonation of delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, permitting the appeal to be registered for admission despite a delay of 108 days. Emphasizing the principle of &quot;sufficient cause,&quot; the court required a comprehensive explanation for the delay, considering the challenges faced by governmental authorities in bureaucratic processes. The judgment highlighted the need to interpret the phrase &quot;within such period&quot; in section 5 and underscored the importance of a pragmatic approach in condoning delays, especially in cases involving public interest. The decision aimed to advance substantial justice while maintaining procedural integrity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 33 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11539</link>
      <description>The court allowed the application for condonation of delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, permitting the appeal to be registered for admission despite a delay of 108 days. Emphasizing the principle of &quot;sufficient cause,&quot; the court required a comprehensive explanation for the delay, considering the challenges faced by governmental authorities in bureaucratic processes. The judgment highlighted the need to interpret the phrase &quot;within such period&quot; in section 5 and underscored the importance of a pragmatic approach in condoning delays, especially in cases involving public interest. The decision aimed to advance substantial justice while maintaining procedural integrity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>