<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 991 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354255</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, recognizing short-term capital gains of Rs. 6,44,816 as genuine. The lower authorities&#039; treatment of the transaction as sham and additions based on assumptions were deemed erroneous. The assessee&#039;s evidence proved the transactions&#039; genuineness, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 19.01.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 991 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354255</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, recognizing short-term capital gains of Rs. 6,44,816 as genuine. The lower authorities&#039; treatment of the transaction as sham and additions based on assumptions were deemed erroneous. The assessee&#039;s evidence proved the transactions&#039; genuineness, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 19.01.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>