https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354245 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the services provided should be classified under Goods Transport Agency Services rather than Clearing and Forwarding Agency Services. The demand for Service Tax was set aside, citing a previous case where similar services were classified as GTA. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's responsibilities and the nature of services provided, concluding that they did not fall under Clearing and Forwarding Agency Services. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for further determination by the original authority. en-us Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Feb 2018 10:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354245 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the services provided should be classified under Goods Transport Agency Services rather than Clearing and Forwarding Agency Services. The demand for Service Tax was set aside, citing a previous case where similar services were classified as GTA. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's responsibilities and the nature of services provided, concluding that they did not fall under Clearing and Forwarding Agency Services. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for further determination by the original authority. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354245