<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 971 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354235</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the additions made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals) were not sustainable under sections 17(2)(iii), 28(iv), or 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that there was no evidence of an employer-employee relationship or benefit in the nature of salary to support the additions. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the additions were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 971 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354235</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the additions made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals) were not sustainable under sections 17(2)(iii), 28(iv), or 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that there was no evidence of an employer-employee relationship or benefit in the nature of salary to support the additions. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the additions were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>