https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354233 The appeal was dismissed with costs quantified at Rs. 1 Lakh, to be equally divided and paid by the Appellant to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) upheld its order, concluding that OP-1 did not contravene the Competition Act, 2002. The CCI found no abuse of dominant position by OP-1 due to the presence of multiple competitors and a declining market share. The Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence of anti-competitive practices, and the CCI determined that OP-1's actions were indicative of enhanced services rather than coercive or anti-competitive behavior. en-us Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:50:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354233 The appeal was dismissed with costs quantified at Rs. 1 Lakh, to be equally divided and paid by the Appellant to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) upheld its order, concluding that OP-1 did not contravene the Competition Act, 2002. The CCI found no abuse of dominant position by OP-1 due to the presence of multiple competitors and a declining market share. The Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence of anti-competitive practices, and the CCI determined that OP-1's actions were indicative of enhanced services rather than coercive or anti-competitive behavior. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354233