<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 966 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354230</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals in full, setting aside the duty confirmation and penalties imposed on the appellants. The judgment was pronounced by Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, Judicial Member of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD on 27/11/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:49:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 966 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354230</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals in full, setting aside the duty confirmation and penalties imposed on the appellants. The judgment was pronounced by Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, Judicial Member of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD on 27/11/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>