https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354221 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the confiscations and penalties imposed on the appellant for manufacturing excisable goods without proper registration. The judgment emphasized that the delay in registration issuance did not justify the confiscations and penalties, as the appellant's registration was deemed to have been granted after the prescribed period. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, providing consequential relief in the form of overturning the impugned order. en-us Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Mar 2019 14:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354221 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the confiscations and penalties imposed on the appellant for manufacturing excisable goods without proper registration. The judgment emphasized that the delay in registration issuance did not justify the confiscations and penalties, as the appellant's registration was deemed to have been granted after the prescribed period. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, providing consequential relief in the form of overturning the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354221