<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 954 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354218</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Custom Department to release a detained consignment of betel nuts upon the petitioner furnishing adequate security, as there was no formal order for seizure/confiscation by the Custom Authority. Despite compliance with the court&#039;s order, the goods remained unreleased due to the Commercial Tax Department&#039;s reliance on Custom Department&#039;s directions. The court dismissed the need for clarification of its order, emphasizing the importance of legal procedures and proper execution of court directives by the concerned departments. The matter was adjourned for the Assistant Commissioner from the Custom Department to provide further explanations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 954 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354218</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Custom Department to release a detained consignment of betel nuts upon the petitioner furnishing adequate security, as there was no formal order for seizure/confiscation by the Custom Authority. Despite compliance with the court&#039;s order, the goods remained unreleased due to the Commercial Tax Department&#039;s reliance on Custom Department&#039;s directions. The court dismissed the need for clarification of its order, emphasizing the importance of legal procedures and proper execution of court directives by the concerned departments. The matter was adjourned for the Assistant Commissioner from the Custom Department to provide further explanations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>