<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1153 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the Revenue and the assessee, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions on various exclusions and filters. It emphasized the importance of accurate segmental data and appropriate filter application for comparability analysis, as well as adherence to jurisdictional High Court judgments for deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:28:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1153 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the Revenue and the assessee, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions on various exclusions and filters. It emphasized the importance of accurate segmental data and appropriate filter application for comparability analysis, as well as adherence to jurisdictional High Court judgments for deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>