<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1613 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198030</link>
    <description>A petition concerning transfer of pending proceedings was dismissed for non-prosecution because the petitioner failed to appear when the matter was called, including after the lunch break, and did not furnish the details required under the Companies (Transfer of Pending Proceedings) Rules, 2016. The Tribunal noted that the petitioner had been directed to appear for further proceedings in accordance with law, but no representation was made in support of the petition. In the circumstances, the absence and non-compliance were treated as sufficient ground to decline further consideration, and the petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:28:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1613 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198030</link>
      <description>A petition concerning transfer of pending proceedings was dismissed for non-prosecution because the petitioner failed to appear when the matter was called, including after the lunch break, and did not furnish the details required under the Companies (Transfer of Pending Proceedings) Rules, 2016. The Tribunal noted that the petitioner had been directed to appear for further proceedings in accordance with law, but no representation was made in support of the petition. In the circumstances, the absence and non-compliance were treated as sufficient ground to decline further consideration, and the petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>