https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198031 The Ethics Regulations were treated as confined to action against registered medical practitioners, not to the hospital's infrastructure, facilities or post-operative care arrangements. Because the Ethics Committee itself accepted that its jurisdiction under the 2002 Regulations did not extend to the hospital as such, adverse observations on the hospital's infrastructure and functioning were held to be beyond jurisdiction. Those observations could not be sustained and were quashed. en-us Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:28:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198031 The Ethics Regulations were treated as confined to action against registered medical practitioners, not to the hospital's infrastructure, facilities or post-operative care arrangements. Because the Ethics Committee itself accepted that its jurisdiction under the 2002 Regulations did not extend to the hospital as such, adverse observations on the hospital's infrastructure and functioning were held to be beyond jurisdiction. Those observations could not be sustained and were quashed. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198031