https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198038 The Court declined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 for a mandamus to compel payment of bills. It emphasized the availability of civil remedies and the inappropriateness of using extraordinary remedies in cases involving serious allegations like service tax evasion. The petitioner was advised to pursue ordinary civil remedies, and the petition was dismissed without costs, highlighting the need to carefully consider the use of mandamus in contractual disputes with significant allegations. en-us Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198038 The Court declined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 for a mandamus to compel payment of bills. It emphasized the availability of civil remedies and the inappropriateness of using extraordinary remedies in cases involving serious allegations like service tax evasion. The petitioner was advised to pursue ordinary civil remedies, and the petition was dismissed without costs, highlighting the need to carefully consider the use of mandamus in contractual disputes with significant allegations. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198038