https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198032 The court declined to entertain the petition seeking mandamus for payment of bills with interest under a contract with the Irrigation Department, emphasizing that contractual matters were not suitable for a writ petition under Article 226. The court highlighted the need for assessment by the competent authority on issues like work completion and adherence to agreed rates, suggesting that the contractor's remedy for non-payment lay in filing a civil suit or invoking arbitration. The court dismissed the petition, stating that the petitioner essentially sought a civil suit decree, which was inappropriate for the current proceedings. en-us Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:28:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198032 The court declined to entertain the petition seeking mandamus for payment of bills with interest under a contract with the Irrigation Department, emphasizing that contractual matters were not suitable for a writ petition under Article 226. The court highlighted the need for assessment by the competent authority on issues like work completion and adherence to agreed rates, suggesting that the contractor's remedy for non-payment lay in filing a civil suit or invoking arbitration. The court dismissed the petition, stating that the petitioner essentially sought a civil suit decree, which was inappropriate for the current proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198032