https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198034 A writ petition under Article 226 was held not maintainable for enforcing a purely monetary claim arising from work orders and submitted bills for transport services, because the relief sought was in substance recovery of dues with interest and not enforcement of any statutory obligation. The contract was not shown to be a statutory contract attracting any exception to the usual rule against writ relief in money claims. The proper remedy was pursuit of an ordinary civil action, and writ relief was declined. en-us Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:28:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198034 A writ petition under Article 226 was held not maintainable for enforcing a purely monetary claim arising from work orders and submitted bills for transport services, because the relief sought was in substance recovery of dues with interest and not enforcement of any statutory obligation. The contract was not shown to be a statutory contract attracting any exception to the usual rule against writ relief in money claims. The proper remedy was pursuit of an ordinary civil action, and writ relief was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198034