https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198036 The High Court clarified that disputes arising from contracts should be resolved through contract law principles rather than writ petitions under Article 226. It emphasized that contractual matters fall within the jurisdiction of competent authorities, not the Court. The Court distinguished between statutory and private contracts, stating that statutory bodies' contracts are governed by general contract law. It highlighted that Article 226 cannot enforce contractual obligations without statutory rights, dismissing the petition and reinforcing the need for civil suits or arbitration for contractual dispute resolution. en-us Mon, 05 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Apr 2023 14:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198036 The High Court clarified that disputes arising from contracts should be resolved through contract law principles rather than writ petitions under Article 226. It emphasized that contractual matters fall within the jurisdiction of competent authorities, not the Court. The Court distinguished between statutory and private contracts, stating that statutory bodies' contracts are governed by general contract law. It highlighted that Article 226 cannot enforce contractual obligations without statutory rights, dismissing the petition and reinforcing the need for civil suits or arbitration for contractual dispute resolution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198036