https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198037 A writ petition under Article 226 was not maintainable for recovery of contractual dues arising from a non-statutory supply contract where adjudication required findings on disputed facts, including the adequacy of supplies, correctness of rates, conformity with contractual terms, and limitation. The proper remedy was a civil suit, including summary procedure under Order XXXVII CPC where appropriate. A second writ petition seeking the same relief after an earlier dismissal was also not entertainable, as repetitive invocation of writ jurisdiction for the same monetary claim amounted to abuse of process. en-us Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:28:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198037 A writ petition under Article 226 was not maintainable for recovery of contractual dues arising from a non-statutory supply contract where adjudication required findings on disputed facts, including the adequacy of supplies, correctness of rates, conformity with contractual terms, and limitation. The proper remedy was a civil suit, including summary procedure under Order XXXVII CPC where appropriate. A second writ petition seeking the same relief after an earlier dismissal was also not entertainable, as repetitive invocation of writ jurisdiction for the same monetary claim amounted to abuse of process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198037