https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198022 The court dismissed the plaintiffs' motion, finding no infringement of copyright in the TV serial or artistic work, and no passing off. The defendants' commercial was deemed an independent creation, not a copy of the plaintiffs' work. Insufficient evidence supported the plaintiffs' claim of ownership of the artistic work. The court ruled no confusion or damage to the plaintiffs' goodwill existed. Each party was to bear their own costs, with potential for future compensation if the plaintiffs succeeded, given the defendants' financial stability. en-us Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jan 2018 18:07:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198022 The court dismissed the plaintiffs' motion, finding no infringement of copyright in the TV serial or artistic work, and no passing off. The defendants' commercial was deemed an independent creation, not a copy of the plaintiffs' work. Insufficient evidence supported the plaintiffs' claim of ownership of the artistic work. The court ruled no confusion or damage to the plaintiffs' goodwill existed. Each party was to bear their own costs, with potential for future compensation if the plaintiffs succeeded, given the defendants' financial stability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198022