https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198022 Copyright in a cinematographic film protects copying of the film itself or a substantial part of its recording; an independently shot work that merely resembles another in idea, theme, or some scenes is not enough. The material compared showed differences in duration, script, sequence, treatment, and overall impact, so no infringement was established. At the interlocutory stage, the artistic work and logo claim also failed because the plaintiffs did not show a protectable original work that was copied. Passing off likewise failed: goodwill, misrepresentation, and a real likelihood of damage, including a merchandising claim, were not shown, and interim relief was refused. en-us Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jan 2018 18:07:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198022 Copyright in a cinematographic film protects copying of the film itself or a substantial part of its recording; an independently shot work that merely resembles another in idea, theme, or some scenes is not enough. The material compared showed differences in duration, script, sequence, treatment, and overall impact, so no infringement was established. At the interlocutory stage, the artistic work and logo claim also failed because the plaintiffs did not show a protectable original work that was copied. Passing off likewise failed: goodwill, misrepresentation, and a real likelihood of damage, including a merchandising claim, were not shown, and interim relief was refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198022