https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198021 The court upheld the decision that the appellants' trade mark was deceptively similar to the respondents' mark, likely causing consumer confusion. It was found that there was no honest concurrent use of the trade mark by the appellants. As a result, the appeal was dismissed with costs. en-us Thu, 12 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jan 2018 17:56:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198021 The court upheld the decision that the appellants' trade mark was deceptively similar to the respondents' mark, likely causing consumer confusion. It was found that there was no honest concurrent use of the trade mark by the appellants. As a result, the appeal was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198021